Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Chorley Building Society
in association with
Key House, Foxhole Road, Chorley, Lancashire,
PR7 1NZ, Tel 01257 279373.
 
 
Friday, 25th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

£35,000 cost of failed review



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Taxpayers forked out more than £35,000 on the failed judicial review into the Leyland Waste Technology Park, it has emerged.
Figures released under the Freedom of Information Act show that Lancashire County and South Ribble Councils spent £41,725 on barristers and council officers.

The county council was taken to the High Court by pressure group RAWS in a bid to overturn planning permission for the waste transfer station which will be built in Farington.

But Mr Justice Irwin threw out the application at the hearing in September 2007.

Lancashire County Council revealed £39,725.80 of taxpayers' cash was spent, with £34,075 spent on counsel.

The remaining £5,650.80 came from time spent by the county secretary and solicitor. But £6,444 of this was recovered from Residents Against Waste Site.

Staff at South Ribble spent 11 hours working on the case and paid £2,000 for advice from a barrister.

David Whelan, legal services manager at South Ribble Council, said: "Circumstances outside the control of the council meant that the issue was not pursued.

"An unknown donor came forward to help out RAWS."



The full article contains 194 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 May 2008 11:08 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Leyland
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.